Updated 2026-06
You don't need a lawyer to self-petition. Written by researchers and engineers who did it themselves. From recommendation letters to peer review to filing — all free and open.
Find the DIY guide tailored to your background
Learn about our coaching services
We connect you with independent recommenders in your field and provide reference drafts for their review and signature
We connect you with journal editors to secure peer review invitations, strengthening your EB1A evidence
NIW / EB1A / O1 coaching and reference drafts to help you prepare your application materials. No legal advice provided.
Systematically strengthen your application through legitimate channels: topic strategy, publication planning, research coaching, monthly reviews, and submission guidance — all authentic and verifiable.
These are reference scenarios based on common application patterns. They do not represent service guarantees or promised outcomes. Every application is different.
Couldn't find independent recommenders related to my research — advisor's suggestions were all collaborators
Matched with 3 professors in adjacent subfields through recommender matching
NIW I-140 Approved
Recommenders who can speak to your work's broader impact are more persuasive than those who only know the technical details
Strong engineering contributions but few papers — unclear how to argue national interest
Translated system-level user impact and performance metrics into a national interest narrative through coaching
NIW Materials Completed
Engineering impact data (DAU, performance improvements) can serve as strong national interest evidence
Papers and citations were strong but lacked peer review evidence
Secured 4 SCI journal peer review invitations through the review invitation service
EB1A Evidence Completed
Peer review records are one of the easiest EB1A criteria to strengthen — start early
The field was too new and specialized, with almost no independent citations and limited support from a traditional academic evidence path
Used open-source project metrics, technical patents, and industry conference talks as alternative evidence, paired with carefully matched recommenders
EB1A Approved
Low citation count does not mean low impact. GitHub stars, patents, and technical talks can help replace traditional citation signals
Free, step-by-step guides written by people who self-petitioned successfully
The NIW (National Interest Waiver) is a green card pathway that does not require employer sponsorship. This guide covers the Dhanasar three-prong test, eligible candidates, required materials, recommendation letter requirements, adjudication process, Premium Processing, RFE strategies, post-approval steps, and discipline-specific strategies, with the latest FY2025 approval rate data.
Read more →EB1A is the first-preference employment-based immigration category in the U.S., allowing self-petition without employer sponsorship. This guide covers detailed analysis of all ten criteria, approval rate data, materials checklist, recommendation letter strategy, peer review record building, RFE response, application process timeline, and every other core topic -- 5000+ words of authoritative content.
As of the June 2026 Visa Bulletin, EB-2 China remains at a Final Action Date of September 1, 2021 and a Dates for Filing date of January 1, 2022. Employment-based adjustment applicants should still use Final Action Dates, and DOS warns that EB-2 China could retrogress or become unavailable in the coming months.
USCIS official data shows FY2026 H-1B eligible registrations fell to 343,981 and the beneficiary-centric system significantly reduced multiple-registration distortion, but H-1B remains a high-uncertainty path. This 2026 update explains why NIW, EB-1A, and O-1 still matter as parallel alternatives.
Is NIW I-140 Premium Processing worth it? This article details the fees ($2,805 -> $2,965), the 45 business day timeline, RFE response strategies, and optimal decision frameworks based on different visa statuses.
Learn from others who are going through the DIY application process
Read GuidesAll guides are free — no signup required
GloryAbroad Q&A
Discuss NIW, EB1A, O1, recommendation letters, peer review, and visa bulletin strategy.
Full application coverage
Topics
审稿证据不只是次数。期刊或会议质量、专业匹配度、邀请原因、完成记录都重要。建议从第一封邀请开始就保留邮件、系统截图和完成证明。
独立推荐信最好围绕外部认可写，不要写成第二份简历。推荐人可以没有合作关系，但要说明他如何了解你的成果，以及为什么他的评价具有独立性。
独立推荐人不认识我，只看论文愿意写，这种信有用吗？（排期焦虑） 我是机器人控制方向，工业界三年。 联系了两个独立推荐人，对方都只看过论文，没有合作过。这样的推荐信会不会太弱？信里应该怎么解释他们为什么有资格评价我的工作？
审稿方向和 NIW proposed endeavor 不完全一致，会不会扣分，数据平台方向算强证据吗？ 有几次 workshop review，还有两次期刊 review。后面做 EB1A 或 NIW 时，这些要放在一起讲 judging，还是分开讲？
审稿证据不只是次数。期刊或会议质量、专业匹配度、邀请原因、完成记录都重要。建议从第一封邀请开始就保留邮件、系统截图和完成证明。
审稿证据不只是次数。期刊或会议质量、专业匹配度、邀请原因、完成记录都重要。建议从第一封邀请开始就保留邮件、系统截图和完成证明。